Connect with us

Published

on

Climate change is the defining issue of our time, and we are at a defining moment. We face a direct existential threat.

In the evolving landscape of business sustainability, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly recognizing the imperative of transitioning to net-zero carbon emissions. SMEs are vital to the global economy, and their transition to net-zero can significantly impact emission reductions. While transitioning is undoubtedly a challenge, it offers substantial marketing and financial opportunities as well.

Making a shift to sustainable practices offers SMEs a chance to:

  1. Enhance their brand image
  2. Attract eco-conscious consumers
  3. Differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive market

In this post, we explore how SMEs can leverage their sustainability efforts not only to mitigate climate impact but also to build stronger customer relationships, foster brand loyalty, and ultimately drive business growth. It is our hope that better understanding the benefits of sustainable practices will motivate more SMEs to pursue these initiatives, leading to better climate outcomes and creating long-term sustainable growth for the economy. Let’s start by looking at a couple of headline case studies that prove our point.

 

 

BrewDog’s Carbon-Negative Drive Sustains $2BN Revenues

A notable case study is BrewDog, a craft beer company currently valued at around two billion dollars. In 2019, BrewDog committed to becoming carbon-negative by 2023. To achieve this goal, BrewDog invested in switching their breweries to renewable energy sources. They also reduced their waste outputs through recycling and upcycling initiatives. Additionally, the company invested in a Scottish Highlands forest that offsets more than the total carbon footprint of their operations.

BrewDog’s bold sustainability commitments, heavily promoted through their branding and marketing campaigns, generated widespread earned media coverage. This helped improve their brand image and made them an instant hit with environmentally conscious consumers.

 

 

Riverford’s Net-Zero Journey Builds a £100M Brand

Another noteworthy case study is Riverford, an organic farming and food delivery company. Riverford committed to going net-zero and followed through by optimizing delivery routes and using electric vehicles to reduce their supply chain emissions. Furthermore, the company transitioned to 100% renewable energy in their operations and promoted local seasonal produce to minimize carbon footprints. Riverford also invested in soil health to enhance carbon sequestration and reduce agricultural emissions.

Riverford’s commitment to sustainability, heavily highlighted in its marketing materials, led to positive media coverage, recognition with various sustainability awards, and a measurable boost for their brand’s reputation. The company became the go-to choice for environmentally conscious clients in the UK, with annual turnovers that have topped £100 million.

 

 

Creating Access to New Markets and Customers

Having reviewed a couple of examples that prove the value of becoming net-zero, let’s dive deeper into the potential benefits SMEs can gain from adopting sustainability as a strategy. Transitioning to net-zero can open up access to new markets and customers for SMEs, particularly as the trend for consumer interest in sustainability continues to rise. While in the early 2000s only 20% of consumers stated sustainability as a concern, Deloitte data from 2020 puts that number at 43%, more than double!

The Marketing Potential of Going Net-Zero for SMEs

Source: Shifting sands: How consumer behavior is embracing sustainability

 

Aligning with this trend guarantees SMEs access to customer segments that prioritize environmental responsibility in their purchasing decisions. While the macro perspective looks promising, it’s worthwhile looking at another couple of case studies to understand how this plays out at the individual SME level.

 

The Eco-Cool Case Study

Eco-Cool Limited, a refrigeration company, faced pressure due to declining sales and revenue caused by increasing competition and regulatory pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The company made the strategic choice to “go green” in an attempt to turn things around. They transitioned to eco-friendly refrigeration units that use natural refrigerants, invested in solar panels to power their manufacturing facility, and adopted energy-efficient practices.

In Eco-Cool’s case, the choice to adopt sustainability as a strategy paid off in a big way. Within just two years of launching their sustainability initiatives, the company started attracting environmentally conscious customers and businesses and secured contracts with retailers seeking to reduce their carbon footprint. This resulted in a 30% increase in new customer acquisitions over the period. Furthermore, the company qualified for government grants and subsidies that promote sustainable business practices.

 

Net Zero – The Opportunity for New Partners

Adopting net-zero policies doesn’t only provide great storytelling opportunities; it also offers SMEs the chance to partner with similar businesses and organizations. By showing a dedication to sustainability, SMEs can draw in partners who share the same values and goals. These partnerships can lead to new business opportunities and joint sustainability projects. The Green Tech case study below serves as an excellent example.

 

Overcoming Challenges and Barriers to Net-Zero for SMEs

Having established the benefits SMEs can gain from adopting net-zero as a strategy, it’s important to balance the picture and discuss the challenges, which can be loosely categorized into two groups: operational and analytical.

 

SMEs Operational Challenges to Sustainability

The most obvious challenges SMEs face on their journey to becoming net-zero are the lack of resources and expertise needed to implement sustainable practices and the limitations of budgets and cash flow that prevent the initial investments required in renewable energy, energy-efficient technologies, etc.

Thankfully, many jurisdictions offer SMEs bridging loans and grants specifically designed to help overcome these challenges. If you’re considering becoming net-zero, it’s well worth looking into what types of support are offered in your area.

 

SMEs Analytical Challenges to Sustainability

A further challenge SMEs face when opting to go green is determining their carbon footprint across their entire supply chain. Most SMEs lack the tools and knowledge needed to accurately track their emissions and are therefore unable to set meaningful reduction targets. Without these targets, it’s impossible for SMEs to determine the scope of effort required to become truly net-zero. Regulatory barriers and market uncertainties complicate the picture even further.

Here again, support exists for those who need it. Local and national trade associations, advocacy groups, and government agencies often provide guidelines for businesses on how to correctly calculate emissions. A good place to start is the Verra Project Methodologies listed below in the appendix. Private sector consultancies such as Carbon Credit Capital are also available to provide these calculations as a service.

 

Conclusion – Embracing Net-Zero: The SME’s Pathway to Success

The journey to reach net-zero by 2030 brings both challenges and opportunities for small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs). This transition is not just about being environmentally responsible; it can also improve brand image, build consumer trust, and help businesses stand out in the market. Case studies like BrewDog and Riverford show that sharing sustainability efforts can boost customer loyalty and attract new eco-conscious clients. Additionally, frameworks from organizations like Verra and consultancies like Carbon Credit Capital help SMEs measure their carbon footprints, plan their sustainability journeys, and certify their emission reduction projects once completed. Contact us today to learn more.

 

Appendix – Introducing the Verra Project Methodologies

Verra Project Methodologies are the set of rules and guidelines used for creating and approving projects under the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) Program. These guidelines ensure projects follow the correct steps to produce real reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. They also ensure projects can issue Verified Carbon Units (VCUs).

Each methodology has specific requirements and guidelines, so SMEs should carefully evaluate which methodology aligns best with their project goals and circumstances. Below are some of the most commonly used methodologies for reference:

 

Agricultural Sector SMEs

  • Climate-Smart Agriculture: This methodology is relevant for SMEs in the agricultural sector seeking to reduce emissions, enhance resilience to climate change, and improve productivity and livelihoods.
  • Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU): This methodology is relevant for SMEs in sustainable agriculture, reforestation, and land use practices.
  • Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+): This methodology is relevant for SMEs in forest conservation and/or involved in activities where deforestation is a concern. It also includes components related to renewable energy and efficiency.
 

Energy Sector SMEs

  • Energy Efficiency: SMEs can implement energy-efficient technologies and practices to reduce emissions and potentially generate carbon credits.
  • Renewable Energy: SMEs in the energy sector can consider implementing renewable energy projects and exploring options for certifying emission reductions through relevant standards.
 

Community and Conservation-Focused SMEs

  • Climate Community & Biodiversity Standards (CCB): This standard focuses on projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, contribute to biodiversity conservation, and support local communities. It is relevant for SMEs active in these areas.
  • Gold Standard (GS): SMEs focused on community development and conservation can benefit from certifying their emission reduction projects through the Gold Standard.
 

General Industry SMEs

  • Verified Carbon Standard (VCS): This is one of the most widely used voluntary greenhouse gas emissions reduction standards, providing a robust framework for verifying and certifying emission reduction projects, including those related to renewable energy and energy efficiency. SMEs across various industries can utilize the VCS for their emission reduction projects.

By adopting these methodologies, SMEs can ensure their projects meet high standards for sustainability, thereby gaining credibility and trust in the eyes of consumers and partners.

Carbon Footprint

SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business

Published

on

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) just rolled out a major revision to its Net-Zero Standard, Version 2.0. It changes how companies set climate targets, how much room they actually have to hit those targets, and how carbon credits fit into a credible net-zero strategy. Below, we break down what’s changing, when it takes effect, and why it matters even if your business isn’t formally an SBTi participant.

Key takeaways

  • SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
  • Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
  • The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
  • Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
  • Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.

Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.

However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.

In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.

How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?

SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.

Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.

What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.

Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation
Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises Focus on short-term climate progress
Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning
We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits

What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?

Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.

The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.

Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.

Old Net Zero Standard New Net Zero Standard
Grounded in net-zero by 2050 Grounded in net-zero by 2050
Climate leadership is reducing emissions Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions
Make a long-term commitment to net-zero Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles
Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal
  • Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal and asset decarbonization plan
  • Adds SBTi’s Asset Transition Method
  • Decarbonization targets are set through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps
  • Ambitious but achievable path based on starting point, financial resources, technology
  • Multiple pathways for unique opportunities and constraints of industries and companies
Businesses who fall behind targets lose status
  • “Best efforts” basis creates flexibility on progress to targets
  • Businesses that miss targets can keep status if they used “every lever” in their control
  • Minimum progress rules will be provided in the SBTi Assurance Manual
Ignores voluntary carbon projects
  • Uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions
  • 2027–2034: Mitigation is recognized. Carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted.
  • 2035 forward: Mitigation with carbon removal credits is required, with durability matching.

When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?

Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).

Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.

What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?

The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.

Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.

Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.

How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.

  1. Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
  2. Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
  3. Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.

How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:

  1. Reducing electricity consumption,
  2. Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
  3. Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.

V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.

The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.

The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.

How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.

Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.

Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:

  1. An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
  2. An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
  3. A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.

What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?

This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.

The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.

  1. Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
  2. Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
  3. Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.

Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.

Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.

How must companies neutralize residual emissions?

At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.

What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?

Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.

  1. Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
  2. Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
  3. Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.

How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard

As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.

We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.

FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?

It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.

What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.

When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?

If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.

Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?

They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.

What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?

Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.

What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?

Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.

The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD

Published

on

For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable

Published

on

A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com