Alphabet’s latest quarterly results tell a powerful story. Google is accelerating its artificial intelligence push at historic speed, but that momentum is colliding with the hard physics of energy, emissions, and infrastructure limits. The company is scaling AI faster than any previous technology cycle—yet keeping emissions in check is becoming more complex and uncertain.
This tension between explosive AI growth and ambitious climate goals defines Google’s next decade.
Alphabet’s Blockbuster Quarter Signals a New AI Era
Alphabet closed 2025 with one of its strongest quarters ever. Revenue surged nearly 18% year over year to $113.8 billion, beating analyst expectations. Earnings per share also exceeded forecasts, and net income jumped almost 30%.
Advertising remained the company’s largest revenue driver, while Google Cloud continued its breakout growth. However, YouTube advertising slightly missed expectations, partly due to weaker comparisons against election-driven ad spending in 2024.
The biggest headline, though, came from Alphabet’s spending plans. The company expects $175–$185 billion in capital expenditures in 2026, more than double its recent annual spend. Most of that money will go toward AI infrastructure, cloud capacity, and strategic investments.
This marks one of the largest corporate infrastructure spending waves in tech history.

Gemini and AI Are Reshaping Google’s Core Business
Google’s AI ecosystem is expanding rapidly across products, platforms, and enterprise services.
Gemini now has over 750 million monthly active users, reflecting massive adoption across search, productivity tools, and developer platforms. Google claims it reduced Gemini’s serving costs by 78% in 2025 through optimization and better infrastructure utilization—highlighting how scale economics are starting to kick in.
Search, YouTube, and Cloud are Increasingly AI-driven:
Google’s main businesses performed strongly.
- Search revenue reached around $63 billion, beating analyst expectations.
- YouTube ads earned $11.38 billion, up from $10.47 billion a year earlier.
- Google Cloud stood out with $17.66 billion, growing nearly 48%.
- Subscriptions, platforms, and devices added another $13.58 billion.
AI is driving much of this growth. Search usage hit record levels as new conversational AI features let people ask longer, more interactive questions. Enterprise adoption of AI is also rising fast. Millions of Gemini Enterprise seats were sold in just a few months, showing strong demand for AI tools across industries.
Waymo Expands Autonomous Ride Services
The earnings report also mentioned that Waymo raised its largest investment to date and continues strong growth, providing over 400,000 rides weekly with safety as a priority.
In December, it surpassed 20 million fully autonomous trips and recently launched service in Miami, with plans to expand across the US, UK, and Japan, including airports and freeways.
- ALSO READ: Alphabet (Google) Surpasses Apple in Value: But How About Their Climate Ambitions and Progress?
Full-Year Context
Annual revenue topped $400 billion for the first time, driven by AI momentum like Gemini processing over 10 billion tokens per minute. Operating income was $35.93 billion for the quarter, with net income at $34.46 billion
The broader strategy is clear: AI is becoming the growth engine across Google’s entire stack, from consumer products to enterprise platforms.

GOOGL Stock Reacts to AI Spending Plans
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) shares fell slightly to $331.25, down 0.54% on high trading volume of 87 million shares. The stock moved after Alphabet’s earnings were out. It’s up 18% year over year.
Investors are watching the company’s $175–185 billion AI spending plan for 2026, which is driving short-term volatility. Analysts remain positive, with a price target of $344 and a “Strong Buy” rating.
The Hidden Cost: Exploding Energy Demand
Behind this AI expansion lies a massive infrastructure footprint. Training and running large AI models require enormous computing power, and that translates directly into electricity consumption.
Google openly acknowledges that AI is driving non-linear growth in energy demand. Unlike traditional digital services, AI workloads scale unpredictably, especially with the rise of multimodal models, agentic systems, and real-time inference.
This uncertainty makes forecasting emissions trajectories far more difficult. Even with efficiency gains, absolute electricity demand is rising sharply.
Let’s take a closer look at Google’s sustainability progress and see the full picture behind its climate efforts.
Google’s Sustainability Moonshot Under Pressure
Google’s climate ambition is among the most aggressive in corporate history. The company aims to cut combined Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by 50% by 2030 compared with 2019 levels. Its long-term goal remains net zero across operations and value chains.
There has been real progress:
- Scope 1 emissions declined 8% in 2024.
- Scope 2 emissions dropped 11% through clean energy procurement.
- Data center energy emissions fell 12% due to new carbon-free power projects.
These gains are notable because Google’s electricity consumption grew 27% in a single year. Decoupling growth from emissions is one of the hardest challenges in corporate decarbonization, and Google has partially achieved it.
But the bigger problem sits outside operational emissions.

Scope 3 Emissions: The Biggest Hurdle
Google’s total ambition-based emissions reached 11.5 million tCO₂e in 2024, up 11% year over year and 51% above its 2019 baseline. The main driver is supply chain emissions—Scope 3—which rose 22% year over year.
These emissions come from hardware manufacturing, construction materials, logistics, and third-party services. As Google builds more data centers and buys more AI hardware, supply chain emissions rise almost automatically.
This creates a paradox: AI expansion increases Scope 3 emissions faster than operational decarbonization can offset them.
Data Center Construction: A Growing Carbon Challenge
One of the fastest-growing emission sources is data center construction. Embodied carbon from steel, concrete, and heavy machinery is becoming a significant part of Google’s footprint.
In 2024, data center construction emissions reached 1.6 million tCO₂e, accounting for 19% of Google’s ambition-based Scope 3 emissions. That figure is expected to rise as AI-driven data center expansion accelerates.
Google is responding with several strategies:
- Standardized data center designs to reduce material use
- Low-carbon concrete and steel to cut embodied emissions by up to 40%
- Electrified construction equipment powered by clean electricity
- Improved space efficiency to maximize infrastructure utilization
These measures can reduce carbon intensity, but they cannot fully offset the scale of new construction.

Policy and Regional Constraints Add Complexity
The company also highlights that policy uncertainty is a major risk. Changes in climate and energy regulations can affect project timelines, costs, and investment decisions.
Regional constraints are equally critical. Many Asia-Pacific markets—key growth regions for Google—lack sufficient carbon-free electricity. Land scarcity, weak renewable resources, and high construction costs make clean energy deployment difficult.
This means AI-driven growth in Asia could significantly increase emissions unless grid decarbonization accelerates.
Google’s Dilemma: AI vs Net-Zero Equation
Alphabet is not an outlier. Every major AI company is facing the same trade-off. AI is becoming core infrastructure for the global economy, but its energy footprint is massive and rising.
Thus, the real question is whether corporate decarbonization can keep pace with AI-driven growth. Three structural tensions stand out:
- Infrastructure Scale vs Emissions Targets: AI requires massive data center buildouts, which drive Scope 3 emissions.
- Energy Demand vs Clean Power Supply: Electricity consumption is growing faster than carbon-free power deployment.
- Corporate Action vs Systemic Constraints: Many challenges, like grid capacity, policy frameworks, and supply chains, are beyond Google’s direct control.
Google’s disclosures offer a rare, transparent look into the carbon cost of the AI revolution. They highlight a broader reality: decarbonizing digital infrastructure is far harder than decarbonizing traditional IT services.
Can it Still Hit Its 2030 Climate Target?
As said before, the tech giant remains committed to cutting emissions by 50% by 2030, and the Science Based Targets initiative has validated its targets. But the path is increasingly narrow.
Operational emissions are trending downward, which is encouraging. The challenge is Scope 3 emissions tied to hardware, construction, and suppliers. Without systemic supply chain decarbonization, absolute emissions could continue rising—even if Google becomes more efficient per unit of compute.
However, its net-zero ambition is still alive, but it now depends as much on global energy systems, policy frameworks, and supply chains as on its own technology and investments.

Aggressive Investment in Carbon-Free Energy
It is investing heavily in clean energy, low-carbon materials, and carbon removal while simultaneously scaling AI faster than any previous technology wave.
Some steps include signing pioneering corporate deals for advanced geothermal and small modular nuclear reactors. The company is also using AI to speed up grid interconnections and optimize power purchasing.
In 2024, Google achieved in nine of its 20 data center grid regions. That’s a significant milestone, but it still falls short of its 24/7 carbon-free energy ambition.
Boosting Carbon Removals
Google is also expanding its carbon removal portfolio. In 2024, it signed 16 new offtake agreements worth over $100 million, bringing its total removal portfolio to around 782,400 tCO₂e.
That is a 14-fold increase from 2023, but it is still tiny compared to millions of tonnes of annual emissions. Carbon removal is a long-term tool, not a near-term solution.

All in all, Alphabet’s Q4 results show a company entering a new phase of AI-driven growth. The planned $185 billion annual infrastructure spend underscores how central AI is to Google’s future.
But the sustainability story is becoming more complex. The next decade will test whether AI can scale sustainably—or whether the world’s most advanced tech companies will struggle to keep their climate promises in the age of artificial intelligence.
- FURTHER READING:
- Google Powers U.S. Data Centers with 1.2 GW of Carbon-Free Energy from Clearway
- Tech Giants Like NVIDIA and Google Eye Space to Power AI with Orbital Data Centers
The post Alphabet’s Blockbuster Q4 2025 Signals a New AI Era—But Will It Cloud Its Net-Zero Promise? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

