Connect with us

Published

on

Solutions for the Surge: New Report on Reducing Energy Costs with Grid-Enhancing Technologies and High-Performance Conductors

Technologies Offer Options for Meeting Growing Electricity Demand, Keeping Costs Down

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A new report released today highlights the important role Grid-Enhancing Technologies (GETs) and High-Performance Conductors (HPCs) can play in ensuring the U.S. transmission grid can meet the surging near-term power demand from growing economic sectors while keeping costs down for consumers. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC’s) recent transmission planning and cost allocation rule, Order 1920, mandates transmission providers develop scenario-based, long-term transmission planning that includes the consideration of GETs and HPCs.

Prepared by The Brattle Group on behalf of the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE), the report, titled “Incorporating GETs and HPCs into Transmission Planning Under FERC Order 1920,” highlights the many benefits of these technologies. The report also addresses how: (1) current planning processes may be inadequate for their consideration; (2) Order 1920 can remedy these deficiencies; and (3) relevant state entities can encourage transmission providers to fully integrate these technologies into transmission planning and selection processes.

“GETs and HPCs are proven tools that can add critical grid capacity in less than a year in some instances,” said Elise Caplan, ACORE’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs. “FERC’s directive in Order 1920 sets the stage for transmission providers to cost-effectively address rapid load growth and other challenges to the grid through careful consideration of these technologies.”

As demonstrated through on-the-ground deployment and various studies, these technologies are well-established, cost-effective technologies that can be quickly deployed in the near term on the existing system and complement the longer-term buildout of transmission. The report finds that cost savings associated with the seven benefits FERC laid out in Order 1920 can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually per region – totaling several billions of dollars per year for all U.S. consumers if they become widely adopted.

“GETs and HPCs are mature, proven technologies, and our analysis found that these tools can provide all seven benefits outlined in FERC Order 1920,” said Bruce Tsuchida, Principal at The Brattle Group and lead report author. “Transmission providers can use a holistic evaluation method when assessing various benefits and comparing potential transmission solutions. These technologies will likely shine through as a lower-cost option to ensuring reliable, affordable power for ratepayers.”

In addition to planning for future needs, transmission providers account for various uncertainties — including investment costs and the trajectory of future changes to load. Improved long-term transmission planning processes can better evaluate all available solutions within multiple scenarios. FERC’s directive also presents significant opportunities for states to work with transmission providers to enhance the technologies’ consideration and promote broader adoption.

“In finalizing Order 1920, FERC directed transmission providers to revamp their planning processes to better plan and prepare the system for future challenges. But it will take some time before Order 1920 is fully effective,” said Rich Glick, Principal at GQS New Energy Strategies and former FERC Chair. “In the meantime, action is needed to address more immediate threats to reliability and affordability. This report shows that GETs and HPCs offer a near-term capacity solution while grid operators continue to plan the regional transmission lines needed to meet future challenges.”

To download a copy of the report, click here.

###

About ACORE:
For over 20 years, the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) has been the nation’s leading voice on the issues most essential to clean energy expansion. ACORE unites finance, policy, and technology to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy. For more information, please visit https://acore.org/.

Media Contacts:
Dylan Helms
Manager, Communications
American Council on Renewable Energy
communications@acore.org
202-935-6491

Ellie Potter
Senior Public Affairs Manager, Macro Grid Initiative
American Council on Renewable Energy
potter@acore.org
202-505-5589

The post Solutions for the Surge: New Report on Reducing Energy Costs with Grid-Enhancing Technologies and High-Performance Conductors appeared first on ACORE.

https://acore.org/news/solutions-for-the-surge-new-report-on-reducing-energy-costs-with-grid-enhancing-technologies-and-high-performance-conductors/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

American-Made U.S. Flags

Published

on

The people at Allegiance Flags announce: Our best-selling 3×5 American Flag is made right here in the USA and will be the perfect addition to your home!

A reader adds:

Adding 2-3 extra stars to the flag will sell so many more flags! I’ll buy one, once we get two – three new states!

It’s hard to know what this guy is trying to say.

If Texas secedes the union, we’ll have one fewer state.

If California splits in half, we’ll have one more, not two or three.

I suppose he’s talking about military intervention into Canada, Greenland, and Cuba.

We’re a pariah nation, rightfully despised by the rest of the developed world.

American-Made U.S. Flags

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Is Greta Thunberg a Climate Scientist?

Published

on

My Republican mother used to ask me about Greta Thunberg, “Since when has a 15-year-old girl become an expert on climate science?’

“She not,” I would reply, “She’s a political activist who trusts what scientists are telling us over what the oil companies say. Whose accounts on this matter do you trust, and why?”

Is Greta Thunberg a Climate Scientist?

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Where Surveys Are Irrelevant

Published

on

We don’t need opinion polls regarding matters of fact.

This is why it’s incorrect to say that we do (or do not) believe in climate change.  One either understands or does not understand climate science.

The same concept applies to the meme at left.  Who could possibly care about the opinions of largely under-educated Americans regarding the strength of the economy under Biden or Trump.

Would you rather ask 100 economists or 100 managers of men’s apparel stores?

Where Surveys Are Irrelevant

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com