A massive new protected area in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – equal to the size of France – has so far failed to include Indigenous people and local communities in its design, and appears to be a tool to promote trade rather than safeguard nature, environmentalists have warned.
Last month at the World Economic Forum (WEF), DRC President Felix Tshisekedi announced the creation of a 2,600 km-long “Green Corridor” stretching from Virunga National Park in the conflict-torn eastern region of North Kivu through the vast forests of Ituri and the Congo River to Kinshasa in the southwest and the Atlantic coast.
According to WEF, the reserve will form the world’s largest protected forest area, also a vital carbon sink as part of the Congo Basin, whose trees absorb and store planet-heating carbon dioxide.
“This project aims to protect some of the most intact tropical forests on the planet, while preserving extraordinary biodiversity, including some iconic species that are very unique to the Congo Basin, ” Tshisekedi said. “DRC is on the way to becoming a global model, proving that economic prosperity and environmental protection can go hand in hand.”
The project will facilitate the transportation of commodities, strengthen agricultural value chains and advance sustainable development in the resource-rich country, he added.
But Indigenous and local groups in eastern DRC told Climate Home they have no idea how the flagship project – slated to safeguard more than 540,000 km² of tropical forest – will be implemented, and fear it could impinge on their land.
“As native peoples, we know nothing,” said Kapupu Diwa Mutimanwa, president of the League of Indigenous Pygmy Associations of Congo. “We have not been consulted about this project – nor have local communities, people that own the land where it will take place been contacted in advance”.
He expressed concern that the project could spark tensions on the ground. “As Indigenous peoples, we might say to the authorities that we do not want this project passing through our cemeteries, as we do not know how it will be operationalised,” he said.
Sustainable – not illicit – activities
Greenpeace Africa said the project, partly funded by the European Union, could perpetuate neo-colonialism, and so far lacks an inclusive approach as it has not respected the principle of gaining buy-in from affected local communities during the planning stage.
Other supporters include Grameen Bank, the Schmidt Family Foundation and the WEF’s 1t.org initiative.
President Tshisekedi has promised that the Kivu-Kinshasa Green Corridor will revitalise the country’s economy, strengthen communities and promote lasting peace in eastern Congo. The region has recently seen Rwandan-backed M23 rebels make significant advances while reportedly committing atrocities on the civilian population.
The government hopes the project will improve the lives of 31 million people. Tshisekedi promised it will create 500,000 jobs, including at least 20,000 for young men and women who have been demobilised from armed groups.
Over half of Virunga National Park, a UNESCO world heritage site that is famous for its endangered mountain gorillas, is currently under rebel control and the long-running conflict has led to increased deforestation.
“By replacing illicit activities with sustainable agricultural and mineral sustainable value chains, we will build an economy that respects both people and nature,” DRC’s leader added in Davos.
Jozef Síkela, the European Commissioner for International Partnerships, who announced 42 million euros ($44 million) in new grant funding for the initiative, said in a post on social media platform X that it would promote job creation and biodiversity conservation.
It will also advance “eco-friendly trade” through the use of “hydrogen-powered boats and solar logistics hubs which will transport up to 1 million tons of goods annually, boosting regional trade and supporting sustainable agriculture”, he added.
Key aspects of the project:
Eco-Friendly Trade: Hydrogen-powered boats and solar logistics hubs will transport up to 1 million tons of goods annually, boosting regional trade a supporting sustainable agriculture.
Jobs and Growth: Over 20,000 jobs will be created, improving… pic.twitter.com/Qo8sFr6Dvw— Jozef Síkela (@JozefSikela) January 22, 2025
The DRC corridor – which Síkela described as a “lifeline for green economic transformation” – is part of the Commission’s Africa-EU Global Gateway, a package running from 2021-2027 that is investing 150 billion euros in the African continent to boost infrastructure projects.
Over the past decade, the EU and five of its member states have already provided around 1 billion euros for the area covered by the DRC’s Green Corridor to support conservation, security, energy, transport as well as agricultural value chains.
Tristan Smith, professor of energy and transport at University College London, is sceptical of some of the proposed ideas such as boats running on hydrogen, which he said is not a competitive or efficient energy source compared with electric batteries.
He warned the project might be “green/development PR” for the EU unless the solutions are thought through in the local context, and set up to operate over a time-frame of 20 years or more.
Imposed from the outside?
Pygmy representative Diwa Mutimanwa said there is a contradiction between the Green Corridor being presented as a community project while it is managed by the state-run Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN).
Furthermore, the plan seems to have been imposed on DRC from the outside, he added.
”The idea of creating this protected area is not a Congolese concept,” he said. “We notice that this has come from a foreign source even though we don’t know what the motivations are behind it all.”
The ICCN did not respond to requests for comment for this story.
After US cuts cash, Green Climate Fund head urges others to step up
Daniel Makasi Mahamba, an environmental analyst and journalist based in the eastern rebel-held city of Goma, said previous natural parks with similar aims had done little to benefit local communities.
“Wanting to create more means depriving Indigenous communities of their rights to use the natural resources in these lands which were once part of their cultural heritage,” he said.
Meanwhile, efforts to ensure that such projects contribute to local development have not always worked in the past, he noted, citing an electrification initiative for communities around Virunga where high levels of poverty made it difficult for local people to access the electric power.
Potential for communities
Joe Eisen, executive director of Rainforest Foundation UK, said he was yet to be convinced that the project can achieve its “lofty aims”. He told Climate Home its ethos appears to be less of a protected area or community reserve and more of a “vehicle to promote green investments” along the corridor.
“A lot of the details – such as how it will protect 100,000 km2 of primary forests and create 500,000 jobs – remain to be seen,” he added.
The proposed reserve is intended to be a “community-managed protected area”, implying active involvement and governance by local communities, according to Tshisekedi.
But a report by the Rainforest Foundation points out that a ministerial decree establishing the corridor “lacks clear measures in terms of how it will function specifically as a Community Reserve”.
Nonetheless, Eisen said there could be upsides if there is genuine willingness on the part of the authorities to develop participatory governance of the area and unlock green investments in things like community forests.
“Some of the provisions built into the decree, such as the requirement for large development of conservation projects to obtain the free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) of impacted local populations, can also in theory change the rules of the game in their favour,” he added.
The post DRC’s huge Green Corridor project lacks buy-in from forest communities appeared first on Climate Home News.
DRC’s huge Green Corridor project lacks buy-in from forest communities
Saturday, 17 October 2026
7.18 AM AWST
Hi folks! We’re joining you live from the Rainbow Warrior where we will be providing you with updates as our four activists continue scaling and occupying Woodside’s gas platform. The activists are peacefully protesting against Woodside’s latest gas expansion plans, the Browse project, which would see up to 57 toxic wells drilled at Scott Reef.
“Right now our activists are scaling Woodside’s massive Floating Production Unit. They are scaling the South-East pillar and the underside of the Helideck. They’ll be setting up camp soon and have plenty of provisions with them – so stick around!”
5:45 AM AWST
Our RHIBS are in the water! We’ve deployed our four activists and our ship crew on our small fast boats, headed to the gas platform. We’re carrying crew and equipment, plenty of food, all of our safety climbing gear, some big banners, cameras and a whole lot of heart… someone even has something to read after they get settled in.
5:26 AM AWST
Before sunrise activists prepared to launch RHIBS from the Rainbow Warrior.
Looking for a front seat view?
You can follow along with the Live Rainbow Warrior bow cam here!
Looking for more?
Follow us on Instagram for a peek behind the scenes and hear from our Rainbow Warrior crew.
Live blog: Greenpeace activists occupy Woodside gas project to save Scott Reef
Climate Change
Greenpeace activists climb and occupy Woodside’s Scarborough gas project calling on the Australian government to “Stop Woodside’s Dirty Gas” and “Save Scott Reef”
PERTH, Saturday 17 October 2026 — Four Greenpeace Australia Pacific activists are scaling and occupying a Floating Production Unit at Woodside’s Scarborough gas project off the coast of Western Australia, displaying banners reading: “Stop Woodside’s Dirty Gas. Save Scott Reef.”
- Photos and video available here and here. More will be uploaded throughout the day.
- Content and live updates will be uploaded to a live blog and to Instagram
Early this morning at 05:45 AWST, Greenpeace Australia Pacific activists launched from the Rainbow Warrior, Greenpeace’s flagship vessel, scaling and attaching themselves to a Floating Production Unit (FPU), a key piece of gas processing infrastructure at the Scarborough gas field over 200km off the coast of Exmouth.
Woodside has since confirmed it has initiated a temporary shut down of the FPU.
Greenpeace Australia Pacific is occupying the gas platform in peaceful protest of Woodside’s plans to drill for oil and gas at Scott Reef as part of its Browse proposal.
David Ritter, CEO at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Greenpeace Australia Pacific is taking action today to expose the unacceptable risk to Scott Reef posed by Woodside’s plans.
“Australians love our oceans. Woodside’s reckless Browse gas proposal would turn the magnificent Scott Reef into an industrial gas zone. Woodside wants to drill up to 57 toxic wells around Scott Reef, Australia’s largest oceanic reef, home to nesting green sea turtles, and endangered species like pygmy blue whales and the dusky sea snake; it is a place like nowhere else on Earth.
“Woodside has an alarming track record of oil spills, incidents and environmental neglect, and can’t be trusted with our oceans. From whaling in Albany in the seventies, to Woodside’s threat to Scott Reef today, there’s more than fifty years of history, of Greenpeace taking action off WA’s coasts to protect our oceans.
“There’s no future in new gas projects. Our future is in secure homegrown renewable energy, green industry and exports, where communities and places like Scott Reef are protected — there’s no future in dirty gas shipped offshore.
“The prospect of drilling for oil or gas on the Great Barrier Reef would be considered absolute madness today, but that is exactly the decision before the government: save Scott Reef or risk its destruction at the hands of a gas corporation.”
From aboard the Floating Production Unit, Dr Chris Holden, Greenpeace Australia Pacific activist said: “As a doctor, when I see new fossil fuel projects like Woodside’s Browse project being put forward, I can’t help but think about the impact this is going to have on the health of our communities and planet, and feel a sense of duty to act.
“Not only will this project do irrevocable harm to nature at Scott Reef, it will have a terrible impact on our climate, putting all of our lives at risk.
“On the Rainbow Warrior I’m carrying a copy of the 2025 Lancet countdown report, which warns that health impacts of climate change are worsening, with millions dying needlessly each year due to fossil fuel dependence, growing emissions, and failure to adequately adapt.
“With warnings like this from the leading global health professionals, our government simply can’t allow fossil fuel projects like Woodside’s Browse project to go ahead. It is their duty to do what is in the best interest of our communities.”
Almost half a million people have signed a petition calling on the government to Save Scott Reef and Woodside’s Browse gas project.
-ENDS-
Notes:
- Dial-in, SimSat and Zoom interviews with Geoff Bice, WA Campaign Lead at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, currently aboard the Rainbow Warrior, can be organised separately
Media contact:
Greenpeace Australia Pacific media team on +61 406 231 892 or +61 407 581 404
The board of the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) will decide on Thursday on whether to “provisionally set aside” $20 million for Nepal to deal with some of the effects of the climate-driven flood it suffered in August.
The motion, seen by Climate Home News, has been drafted by a group of board members from both developed and developing countries and so is likely to pass easily at the fund’s first-ever extraordinary board meeting on October 22.
It invites the government of Nepal to submit a proposal for how to use the money, with the board then deciding at one of its regular board meetings whether to approve the proposal or not.
While Nepali officials have described $20 million as merely “symbolic” in the face of the $4.8 billion estimated costs of recovery and reconstruction, it would be the first time the new FRLD – agreed in 2022 months after devastating floods in Pakistan – has set aside money for a specific disaster.
Until now the fund has only taken requests through a single call for proposals, launched at COP30 in Belém last November, that gave countries six months to submit requests.
Most of the 180 projects the FRLD is currently considering are designed to help countries avoid damage from future climate disasters, for example by strengthening responses to floods in Bangladesh and Lagos.
The draft decision says Nepal’s proposal will serve as a pilot for how funding requests can be submitted outside of the fund’s current timetable. That could let governments seek funds quickly after a climate disaster strikes, rather than waiting for the next call.
This arrangement would set the fund apart from other United Nations funds designed for climate adaptation or cutting emissions like the Green Climate Fund.
Climate campaigners from Fill the Fund said the draft decision is “a real step forward” as it is “the first time this Fund has moved to respond to a specific disaster”.
Too little, too late
The FRLD was agreed by governments at COP27, set up and operationalised at COP28 in 2023 but has yet to award any money. The 180 funding requests it is currently considering would cost around $2.8 billion, but it only has $350 million to allocate.
The United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has described the amount of money available in the fund as “ridiculously small” and Fill the Fund said $20 million “is a meaningful signal but it is a drop against an ocean of need”.
A glacial rock and ice collapse sent a torrent of water and debris through Nepal and the Chinese-administered region of Tibet on August 26. It killed more than 1,400 people, left thousands more missing and destroyed homes, bridges, roads and hydropower plants. Nepal’s finance and environment ministers quickly appealed to the FRLD board for funds, saying that “time is of the essence”.
Their call was followed swiftly by a letter from developing country FRLD board members urging the board’s co-chairs to organise an extraordinary meeting to allocate funds to Nepal.
But developed countries initially called for an informal consultation rather than a full board meeting. It took a further 45 days for the board’s co-chairs to organise an extraordinary board meeting for October 22 and to draft a motion for adoption.
Fill the Fund called for a permanent way of the fund rapid responding to disasters as “Nepal should not have required historic letters, an informal drafting group and the Fund’s first-ever extraordinary meeting simply to unlock an emergency response. The next country cannot wait two months and a bureaucratic marathon. Speed must be built in, not improvised.”
The post UN’s loss and damage fund set to give Nepal $20m for flood recovery appeared first on Climate Home News.
UN’s loss and damage fund set to give Nepal $20m for flood recovery
Is a Team of Is a Bunch of MAGA Thugs Beating the Snot Out of a Woman a New Low, or Is it What We Now Need to Expect?
Live blog: Greenpeace activists occupy Woodside gas project to save Scott Reef
Greenpeace activists climb and occupy Woodside’s Scarborough gas project calling on the Australian government to “Stop Woodside’s Dirty Gas” and “Save Scott Reef”
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-