In a dramatic overhaul at Nickel 28 Capital Corp., the board has ousted three top executives following a rigorous internal investigation.
The shake-up at the nickel-cobalt producer saw CEO Anthony Milewski, President Justin Cochrane, and CFO Conor Kearns dismissed for serious breaches of conduct and policy non-compliance, sending shockwaves through the corporate ranks.
Nickel 28 shares soared 18% on the news of the termination in early trading on May 6th.
- Cochrane and Milewski are founders of a research and consulting group
- Milewski was the original CEO of Carbon Streaming Corp before Cochrane became the CEO in late 2020.
- Kearns is the current CFO of Carbon Streaming Corp under CEO Justin Cocrhane
- Maurice Swan, Board Member of Nickel 28, is also the Chairman of Carbon Streaming Corp.
The firings, effective after the close of business on May 3, 2024, were announced following findings from an independent special committee formed in early December 2023. This committee was tasked with examining the executives’ adherence to insider-trading, expense policies, and the code of business conduct and ethics.
Their investigation revealed misconduct including breaches of duty, poor judgment, and various violations of Nickel 28’s internal policies. None of the company’s findings have been proven in court.
Dismissed Executives Justin Cochrane, Conor Kearns and Board Member Maurice Swan’s ties to Carbon Streaming Corp.
Amid the upheavals at Nickel 28, the connections between ousted executives and other industry entities have come under scrutiny.
Notably, Conor Kearns, the former CFO, along with Justin Cochrane, the ousted president, and Nickel 28 board member Maurice Swan, are all known to have ties with Carbon Streaming Corp., a firm specializing in carbon credits and streams.
This involvement raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the integrity of their professional judgments in their roles at Nickel 28, and now, potentially Carbon Streaming.
The overlap in executive roles between different corporations is a common practice but invites a closer examination of governance and ethical standards, especially in light of the recent findings of misconduct at Nickel 28. Maurice Swan is Director of Nickel 28, and current Chairman of Carbon Streaming. Swan was the former Chair of the Compensation Committee at Carbon Streaming until he stepped down late in 2023.
Such relationships are particularly relevant as they could influence decision-making processes and strategic directions not only at Nickel 28 but across the broader business spectrum where these individuals hold influence.
- Carbon Streaming has come under fire recently from activist shareholder groups for executive compensation and G&A spending.
- The company promoted a new CEO in June 2023, before he resigned after only 3 weeks on the job – and Cochrane retook the position.
Investigation and Findings
The special committee’s investigation at Nickel 28 delved into historical compensation arrangements and the compliance of these senior figures with the company’s insider-trading, expense policy, and code of business conduct and ethics. It also examined potential conflicts of interest and related party transactions involving company insiders and key employees.
Their thorough review culminated in an unanimous recommendation to the board to terminate the implicated executives for cause. The board, accepting these recommendations, has also reserved all rights to initiate legal proceedings to recover losses and gains obtained through the executives’ alleged misconduct. However, they noted that these findings are not expected to materially impact the company’s prior financial statements.
Immediate and Future Leadership Changes
In response to the leadership vacuum, the board acted swiftly to appoint Christopher S. Wallace as the interim CEO. Wallace, a current board member known for his extensive experience in leadership and finance within the critical-minerals industry, is expected to steer the company through this turbulent period.
Additionally, Brett Richards, another board member with over 37 years in the mining and metals industry, will provide consultancy services to assist with the transition.
Martin Vydra, Executive Vice-President of Strategy, and Craig Lennon, Head of Asia-Pacific, will continue in their roles, ensuring operational continuity.
Company Outlook and Strategic Vision
Despite these significant upper-management upheavals, Nickel 28 reassures stakeholders that its core strategic vision and objectives remain steadfast. The board and the continuing leadership team are committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in all operations.
Nickel 28 Capital, known for its 8.56-percent joint venture interest in the producing, long-life, and world-class Ramu nickel-cobalt operation located in Papua New Guinea, continues to be a pivotal player in the nickel and cobalt markets. These metals are critical for the burgeoning electric vehicle sector, underscoring the company’s strategic importance.
In addition to Ramu, Nickel 28 manages a portfolio of 10 nickel and cobalt royalties on development, prefeasibility, and exploration projects across Canada, Australia, and Papua New Guinea.
Implications for Stakeholders
The abrupt leadership changes and the circumstances leading to them could stir investor concerns regarding governance and oversight within Nickel 28. However, the board’s proactive stance in addressing these issues and setting a course for robust oversight and transparent management practices might help in stabilizing trust among investors and partners.
As the company navigates through these changes, the outcomes of any legal actions and future disclosures related to the termination of the senior executives will be closely watched by shareholders and industry analysts alike.
The full details of the impact of these terminations will be disclosed in the company’s future continuous disclosure filings, including its 2025 management information circular, ensuring that stakeholders are kept fully informed.
The coming months will be critical for Nickel 28 as it seeks to maintain its operational integrity and market position amidst these internal challenges. With a renewed leadership team at the helm, the company aims to navigate through these turbulent waters, reaffirming its commitment to best practices and shareholder value.
The post Nickel 28 Capital Ousts CEO Anthony Milewski and President Justin Cochrane in Leadership Purge Over Misconduct appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
