Connect with us

Published

on

As the Annual Meetings of the African Development Bank (AfDB) took place this week in the Ivory Coast, civil society campaigners have been calling for the bank to stop funding fossil gas, but a senior official told Climate Home that the bank will continue to fund the fossil fuel in order to support intermittent sources of renewable electricity.

On the sidelines of the meetings in Abidjan, these campaigners criticised the bank’s decision not to exempt investments in gas from its energy sector policy and called on the bank to exclude gas projects in Mission 300 — a joint initiative of the AfDB and World Bank launched last year to connect 300 million Africans to electricity by 2030.

“We should be doing all that we can to help Africa leapfrog [to renewables] and not dive deeper into the gas era,” said Greenwatch policy advisor Anja Gebel at a side event organised by Power Shift Africa.

Echoing this call, after the election of Mauritania’s Ould Sidi Tah as the bank’s next president, civil society groups in a statement said that the new president should institute “a comprehensive ban on fossil fuel financing by the AfDB, including gas”.

Cobalt and nickel-free electric car batteries boom in “good news” for rainforests

But Wale Shonibare, AfDB’s director for energy financial solutions, policy, and regulations, does not see the bank’s funding of gas ending soon. He said that the bank will continue funding gas because it will serve as a transition fuel.

He said that, in some parts of the continent, gas can cheaply provide the necessary baseload – meaning a consistent supply of electricity – to support solar and wind power, whose electricity generation varies. “When the sun is not shining what happens? so you need baseload that will be there all the time ,” he told Climate Home.

Shonibare said that the grid is a controlling factor, and countries must assess how much renewable energy their infrastructure can handle. He gave the example of Chad, saying their grid capacity is only about 150 megawatts.

“I cannot put more than 30 megawatts of renewables on the grid, otherwise it’s going to destabilise the grid”, he said, so base load from gas or hydropower is necessary.

The AfDB has made it clear that it will no longer finance coal, Shonibare said, but “we have never said that we will never do any fossil but when we do fossil we are going to justify that that’s the best and least-cost solution for the countries at the time”. For now, it is impractical for Africa to go from fossil fuels to renewables, he added.

Peruvian farmer loses climate case against RWE – but paves way for future action

Europe’s gas station

Rajneesh Bhuee, Stop Funding Gas Campaign manager at Recourse, said the bank promotes fossil gas as the least-cost solution due to its readily available reserves on the continent, but in reality, these countries are not tapping into those reserves for local consumption.

“There is no country on the continent that you can point out and say that has invested in gas that is using that gas for local consumption. There is this narrative that Africa is becoming Europe’s gas station because we are continuously exporting gas,” she told Climate Home.

She warned that fossil gas threatens countries’ climate goals, locks countries into long-term dependence on fossil fuels and deepens debt crisis of these countries “because they are investing into a resource that in the next 10 to 15 years will no longer have a market”.

Bhuee’s Recourse, which developed a fact sheet alongside other civil society, found that while the AfDB reached a significant milestone in 2024 with no fossil fuel project funding approved, the bank’s classification of high carbon fossil gas as a ‘transition fuel’, leaves the door open for backsliding to more fossil investments in the future.

Scientists predict global warming of more than 1.5C for 2025-2029 period

The fact sheet recommended that the AfDB should exclude gas from Mission 300 and maintain the phase out of fossil fuels investments by changing the bank’s energy sector policy to exclude all fossil fuels including fossil gas, from future investments.

Ould Tah backs fossil fuels

Civil society groups want the new president to take this forward and pave a new path for the continent’s energy future by shifting toward 100% renewables.

Fiza Naz Qureshi, gas campaigner at Big Shift Global Campaign, said Ould Tah must show “bold leadership that breaks from fossil fuel dependency,” adding that continued support for gas — including through Mission 300 and clean cooking initiatives — “risks locking communities, especially women, into harmful energy systems”.

But the Mauritanian appears to support a different approach to Africa’s energy future. In an interview with Africanews, he said the continent can thrive by using “all available energy resources to support economic growth”.

Women aren’t 14 times more likely to die in disasters – inequality is the real killer

In a separate interview with The Africa Report, Ould Tah said the bank has the capacity to do more, as currently it approves much less funding annually than other multilateral banks, which he finds concerning considering Africa’s vast infrastructure gaps and the urgency of meeting the sustainable development goals.

However, his ambitions to increase funding may face stiff challenges. The global breakdown in multilateral cooperation and a proposed funding reduction from the United States threaten to constrain the bank’s ability to expand. Just last month, Washington proposed a $555 million cut to the AfDB’s African Development Fund that supports the continent’s poorest countries.

In light of this, the bank is turning to innovative mechanisms like carbon markets to raise financing for climate action and energy security. At the Annual Meetings, the AfDB launched an Africa carbon support facility which officials say will support countries in developing policies and regulations to govern carbon trading. The aim is to make carbon credits a tradable commodity on Africa’s stock exchanges, according to Reuters.

Affirming this commitment, Kevin Kariuki, AfDB’s vice president for power, energy, climate change and green growth said that “carbon market development is an imperative for the continent”.

The post Civil society groups push back on fossil gas funding as AfDB welcomes new president appeared first on Climate Home News.

Civil society groups push back on fossil gas funding as AfDB welcomes new president

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Why an Activist From Texas Crossed the World to Confront Asia’s Biggest Petrochemical Company

Published

on

For the retired shrimper, the 8,000-mile trip to Formosa Plastics’ annual shareholder meeting in Taipei was part of a strategy of being relentless.

The Resistance, Part 2: Three Gulf Coast environmentalists confront Formosa Plastics Corp. at its shareholders meeting.

Why an Activist From Texas Crossed the World to Confront Asia’s Biggest Petrochemical Company

Continue Reading

Climate Change

America Is Policing Foreign Waters, but Gutting Domestic Protections

Published

on

The U.S. government’s recent deployment of visa restrictions for international illegal fishing exposes a dichotomy between how it wields power at home versus away.

While the Trump administration systematically unravels marine protections at home, it appears to be enforcing far higher conservation standards abroad.

America Is Policing Foreign Waters, but Gutting Domestic Protections

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Brazil jostles for rare earths share as US-China rivalry heats up

Published

on

Brazil is rushing to regulate its critical minerals industry and unlock its vast untapped reserves of rare earths, aiming to position itself as a strategic producer with Chinese and US companies competing for fresh supplies.

Despite opposition from some environmental and Indigenous rights groups, lawmakers in Brazil’s lower house of Congress passed the government’s critical minerals policy bill last month, and backers now hope to secure final Senate approval before October’s presidential election.

Already a major mining nation with large reserves of graphite and copper, Brazil has the world’s second-largest reserves of rare earth elements after China, with the difference that Brazilian reserves are largely untapped. This group of 17 minerals is used in permanent magnets for electric motors vital for clean technologies such as electric vehicles (EVs) and wind turbines.

As Chinese and US companies compete to secure supplies, Brazil hopes to serve them both.

“We don’t have any preferences. Whoever wishes to participate with us to help with the mining, processing, and production of the wealth that these rare earths can bring is welcome to invest in Brazil,” President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva told journalists after meeting President Donald Trump in Washington in May.

Value-added mining

The draft legislation, which is backed by industry groups, creates a $380-million Guarantee Fund for Mineral Activity meant to provide financial support for mining projects, grants priority status for permitting strategic mining projects, and requires companies to dedicate a share of their revenue for domestic research and development on mineral extraction and processing – part of the policy’s effort to maximise the benefits of mining.

To select strategic projects and support their environmental licensing, the bill envisions establishing a Committee for Strategic and Critical Minerals, which includes representatives from different government agencies, state and local governments, industry and civil society.

Mining Minister Alexandre Silveira said the government’s bill “aligns mineral exploration with national interests”, and he has pledged to work closely with the Senate to pass it in the coming months.

“Brazil … doesn’t intend to be a mere exporter of unprocessed raw materials, but to expand its industrial and technological capacity, too,” Silveira said last month.

The Brazilian government says the country presents an “unparalleled” opportunity for refining “green minerals”, given that around half of its electricity comes from hydropower.

At the other end of the supply chain, several Chinese companies have vast plans to assemble EVs in Brazil. EV manufacturing giant BYD opened a massive production facility in the state of Bahia last October – the company’s largest EV factory outside China. BYD’s top executive in Brazil told Reuters it is aiming to produce and source 50% of its vehicle components in the country by the end of the year. BYD’s subsidiaries in Brazil directly own mineral rights in the country’s “lithium valley”.

Brazil’s Congress defies Lula to push through “devastation bill” on COP30’s heels

Some pro-government lawmakers had proposed the creation of a state-owned agency that would hold a monopoly over mining projects, but that was eventually rejected after the federal government decided that no additional state intervention was needed in the sector.

Mônica Sodré, CEO of the Brazilian Center for International Relations (CEBRI), said the country’s mining rules were created when minerals were mainly seen as “commodities for export”. Today, they are “central to economic security, industrial policy and geopolitics,” she said.

The proposed legislation, she added, is “an important first step, not a final solution” to position the country as a major mineral producer, and developing projects will require continued efforts through the newly-created committee.

Soft on safeguards?

But despite the government’s pledges to develop a critical minerals sector that benefits the national interest, some environmental groups have opposed the critical minerals policy bill, saying it does not create enough safeguards for the protection of affected communities.

Adriana Pinheiro, public policy advisor with Observatório do Clima, a network representing 130 environmental nonprofits, told Climate Home News that the bill “lacks explicit provisions on free, prior and informed consultation”.

    The Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil (Apib) said in a note to Congress that the bill has the “potential to significantly impact indigenous territories without adequately incorporating mechanisms for protection and participation”.

    Sodré said the concerns are valid, but that the draft bill is not the place to address them. Instead, she said, indigenous rights and participation should be considered on a project-by-project basis and that safeguards exist under Brazil’s “extensive” environmental permitting legislation.

    “Precaution is essential in mining policy, but it should not lead to inaction. Blocking investments or delaying projects without clear evidence of unacceptable risks can result in significant social and economic costs,” she said.

    Pinheiro, of the Observatório do Clima, added that while the bill encourages domestic processing of critical minerals, it does not create mandatory quotas. Countries such as Indonesia and Zimbabwe have banned raw exports, forcing investors to set up processing plants in the country.

    “This regulation is only positive if it combines industrial strategy with strong safeguards,” Pinheiro said.

    Geological advantage

    China extracts about 70% of the world’s rare earths and controls around 90% of the processing – creating a potential chokepoint that has alarmed Western countries at a time of heightened geopolitical tension. The US and China have opted to stockpile key minerals in case trade restrictions are enacted against them.

    Brazil, which has strong trade and diplomatic ties with both Beijing and Washington, views the intensifying competition for rare earth supplies as an opportunity for it to develop a new mining sector. Brazil’s National Mining Agency has reported about 2,700 rare earths projects under consideration, according to local news outlet Folha de Sao Paulo.

    The country’s rare earths reserves also have a geological advantage, as they are predominantly contained in ionic clay rather than hard rock. These deposits contain sought-after “heavy rare earths” and require less processing to extract.

    Workers of Sigma Lithium Corp SGML.V are seen at the Grota do Cirilo mine in Itinga, in Minas Gerais state, Brazil April 18, 2023. REUTERS/Washington Alves

    Workers of Sigma Lithium Corp SGML.V are seen at the Grota do Cirilo mine in Itinga, in Minas Gerais state, Brazil April 18, 2023. REUTERS/Washington Alves

    Backed by $2.7 billion in financial support from US government agencies, American mining firm USA Rare Earths acquired Brazil’s Serra Verde group, which owns the high-grade Pela Ema mine. The ionic clay mine is the only one outside Asia capable of supplying all the four major rare earths at scale, according to the company’s CEO Barbara Humpton.

    Other major firms have followed, with Canada’s Aclara conducting studies in the $680-million Carina mine and Australian companies Meteoric and Viridis also seeking to develop ionic clay mines for European and American buyers.

    Despite growing Western investments, China remains Brazil’s largest trade partner and the country’s imports from Brazil have already tripled between 2024 and 2025, according to data by the Brazil-China Business Council.

    The draft bill does not guarantee that Brazil will be able to compete with Chinese rare earths on the international market, Sodré noted. A “more realistic benchmark” is how effectively the country can position itself as major supplier of critical minerals for the energy transition, she added.

    Pinheiro said clearer regulation may help shape investments into the country, but foreign companies will not necessarily wait for Brazil’s critical minerals policy.

    “The central question is whether Brazil will use this moment to build domestic value chains, ensure socio-environmental safeguards and protect affected communities,” she said.

    The post Brazil jostles for rare earths share as US-China rivalry heats up appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Brazil jostles for rare earths share as US-China rivalry heats up

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com