Connect with us

Published

on

For the Indigenous Peoples of the Maritime provinces, the Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqiyik, Passamaquoddy, Maliseet, and Inuit, the oceans and waterways are living relatives, holding centuries of memory and wisdom. These waters are not simply geographic features; they are beings with spirit, elders who have witnessed the shifting balance of climate through generations. The rising of ocean levels, the warming of seas, and the increasing fury of storms are warnings that echo both ancient stories and contemporary experience. 

 Traditional Knowledge of Oceans and Climate: Past Lessons

Indigenous oral histories and knowledge systems possess a deep understanding of the rhythms and changes in the ocean and climate over time. Elders recount shifting shorelines, changing fish migrations, and the cyclical nature of storms and tides, knowledge gained through careful observation and a deep connection with the natural world. For millennia, these teachings guided communities in timing their harvests, moving settlements, and stewarding land and sea to maintain balance. 

 In Mi’kma’ki, for example, stories recount times when the waters rose and reshaped the coast, teaching that the ocean was both a giver and a taker. These ancient accounts help contextualize current changes as part of a long-standing relationship marked by respect and adaptation, rather than conquest or control. They remind us that climate is a force we live with, not simply a problem to be solved. 

The Present Reality: Changing Oceans and Rising Threats

Today, those long-held relationships are tested as the ocean warms and rises at unprecedented rates. Hurricanes and severe storms, once rare and cyclical, are growing in size, frequency, and intensity, driven by warmer sea surfaces and shifting atmospheric patterns. For Indigenous peoples of the Maritimes, these are not distant phenomena but lived realities, returning with growing impact. 

Hurricane Fiona in 2022 devastated coastal Mi’kmaw communities in Cape Breton and Ktaqmkuk, causing widespread erosion, damage to sacred sites, and threatening the continuity of food and cultural harvesting areas. Inland, communities have observed changes in river flows and wetland health, which impact freshwater fisheries and travel corridors. 

Sea level rise, compounded by coastal development and weakened natural barriers, is accelerating shoreline loss, flooding, and saltwater intrusion into freshwater systems, disrupting habitats and traditional harvest zones for shellfish, medicinal plants, and migratory birds. These changes undermine food sovereignty and community resilience if left unaddressed. 

Preparing for the Future: Combining Traditional Knowledge and Innovation

Indigenous communities across the Maritimes are leading innovative responses rooted in millennia of knowledge coupled with contemporary science and technology. Mi’kmaq leaders collaborate with coastal ecologists to restore salt marshes, eelgrass beds, and kelp forests —natural buffers that stabilize sediments, absorb storm surges, and sequester carbon. 

 On Epekwitk (Prince Edward Island), collaborative “living shoreline” projects integrate Mi’kmaw understanding of local ecosystems with natural materials, such as reed grasses and oyster reefs. These efforts reduce erosion while honouring the relationships between people, plants, and water. 

In Wolastoqey and Passamaquoddy territories, along the St. John River and Bay of Fundy, community monitors combine satellite data with Indigenous place-based observations to track shifting ice patterns, tides, and river flows, anticipating and preparing for future climate impacts. 

Some communities are also considering strategic relocation, recognizing that some ancestral sites may become too vulnerable to sustain habitation. These decisions are deeply guided by cultural protocols, emphasizing ceremony, respect, and reciprocity with the land, even as physical homes may shift.  

Climate Change as a Teaching and Call to Action

For Indigenous Peoples of the Maritimes, the climate crisis is more than a scientific challenge; it is a profound ethical and spiritual call. The ocean’s fury, the rising tides, and shifting weather patterns are reminders of broken relationships and imbalance. They teach humility, resilience, and the seriousness of respecting all beings.  

Adapting to this new reality requires more than just complex infrastructure; seawalls and barriers alone cannot restore the flow of life. True resilience grows from strengthening relationships with the ocean, with the lands, and among peoples and embracing stewardship guided by Indigenous laws and teachings.

Toward Resilient Coastal Futures

The seas that lap the shores of Mi’kma’ki, Wolastoqey, and Ktaqmkuk carry the memory of storms past and the promise of renewal. Indigenous Nations in the Maritimes stand at the forefront of a movement to restore coastal ecosystems and cultural connections, combining ancient knowledge and contemporary science to face a changing climate with strength. 

 By listening deeply to the waters and honouring our responsibilities as caretakers, we can respond not only to minimize harm but to rebuild balance. The ocean is more than a force of destruction; it is a relative offering that teaches and provides opportunities to walk forward in a respectful, reciprocal relationship. As we navigate this unfolding climate reality, Indigenous stewardship, leadership, and knowledge stand as beacons not only for the peoples of the Maritimes but for all who share this land and sea. 

Blog by Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

(Image Credit: Chris Robert, Unsplash)

The post The Waters Speak: Indigenous Knowledge and Climate Change in the Maritimes appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

The Waters Speak: Indigenous Knowledge and Climate Change in the Maritimes

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Emergency Drawdown at Flaming Gorge Hits Its Recreation Economy

Published

on

The drought-induced draw to save downstream Lake Powell is wreaking havoc on Wyoming-Utah’s beloved recreation area.

As campers with boats flocked to Buckboard Marina at the start of Memorial Day weekend, Tony Valdez was busy issuing refunds and repairing broken boat ramps. One older Green River man, who walked with two canes, left with his money refunded for the season after discovering he could not safely make it down to the boat slip. Due to dropping water levels at Flaming Gorge Reservoir, the ramp is now buckled, angling up and down like a pitched roof.

Emergency Drawdown at Flaming Gorge Hits Its Recreation Economy

Continue Reading

Climate Change

More Coral Reefs May Survive Climate Change Than Scientists Once Thought

Published

on

A new global analysis maps reefs with the greatest potential to withstand warmer temperatures, strengthening calls for their protection.

For years, the outlook for coral reefs has been increasingly bleak. Mass coral bleaching events caused by severe marine heatwaves have fueled repeated warnings that reefs are rapidly on an irreversible path of decline. But new research is challenging that narrative.

More Coral Reefs May Survive Climate Change Than Scientists Once Thought

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Bonn Bulletin: Adaptation Fund stalemate puts people at risk, says head

Published

on

Dark clouds are gathering over adaptation finance. The US has all but stopped providing it and European countries are slashing their aid budgets to spend more on their militaries. Much of what is flowing comes in the form of loans and doesn’t reach the most vulnerable, as we’ve reported.

Over the years, one bright spark has been the Adaptation Fund and its grants to developing countries for pioneering work in communities. It has allocated $1.6 billion to 226 projects, benefiting 90 million people, its website says. And, while rich nations are failing to give the fund all the money it needs to finance its growing pipeline, new revenues are supposed to come in from the Paris Agreement’s new carbon market, known as Article 6.4.

Back at COP26 in Glasgow, governments agreed that the Adaptation Fund should get 5% of the proceeds from all Article 6.4 carbon credits – other than those based in small islands and least developed countries.

How much money that will amount to is uncertain. It depends on how many projects there are and the price of their credits. 

The fund got over $200 million from a similar share of proceeds under the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), although the price of those credits collapsed. 

While $200 million was a disappointment as ten times that was expected, the Adaptation Fund head Mikko Ollikainen told Climate Home News in Bonn that the sum was “not insignificant”. By comparison, the fund has been seeking $300 million per year from donor governments in recent years.

Hopes are that the CDM’s successor will yield bigger sums for adaptation. But for the fund to get its hands on the share of cash it is expecting from Article 6.4 projects , governments need to agree to transition the fund to “exclusively” serve the Paris Agreement. They are hoping to wrap up those talks in Bonn this week, so that they can rubber-stamp the decision early at COP31.

    It has not been plain-sailing. As small islands’ lead negotiator Anne Rasmussen told a press conference on Tuesday, this transition “is being blocked, frustrating efforts to replenish the fund and ensure that the crucial adaptation finance can flow to those that need it the most”.

    This issue, along with other finance complaints, leads small islands “to question whether the implementation of the NCQG [the 2035 finance goal agreed at COP29] is dead on arrival”, she added.

    The problem is related to who is considered a developed country at UN climate talks, with the responsibilities for providing climate finance that designation implies.

    Traditional donor countries, which have been pushing for years for some wealthier developing countries like Saudi Arabia and China to contribute to climate finance as well, want the Adaptation Fund’s board seats to be split between “developed” and “developing” countries. 

    They argue that these are the categories referred to in the Paris Agreement and so are appropriate for a fund that exclusively serves that accord.

    Developing countries – which have long opposed any of their members being considered developed – argue that the board seats should continue to be split between “Annex 1” and “non-Annex 1” countries. 

    These categories, based on lists of nations drawn up in 1992, are more rigid than “developed” and “developing”. While development status can change over time, you’re either on the Annex 1 list or you’re not.

    Ollikainen said a delay in agreement beyond COP31 – a risk if the issue is not resolved here in Bonn – would harm people in the real world where adaptation needs are rising sharply while the money to protect them from worsening climate impacts is not.

    “If we don’t address adaptation,” the fund’s head told Climate Home News, “that will lead to loss and damage and that’s going to be even more costlier than adaptation – and the cost will be borne by people who have done least to cause this problem who typically don’t have social safety networks to support them.”

    The post Bonn Bulletin: Adaptation Fund stalemate puts people at risk, says head appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Bonn Bulletin: Adaptation Fund stalemate puts people at risk, says head

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com