Gita Chaudhary is Nepal’s Minister of Agriculture, Forests and Environment.
We are still grieving the thousands dead and missing from the Rasuwa-Bhotekoshi climate catastrophe on August 26. The ice-rock avalanche originated at 5,200m above sea level and carried roughly 100 million cubic metres of debris-laden water, at an average speed of 150km/h, burying homes, farms, schools in minutes. We lost more than 1,400 lives and more than 5,200 people remain missing.
Scientists have classified 21 glacial lakes in Nepal as dangerous due to melting permafrost and ice in the Himalayas, so even as we work on the recovery, we believe this can happen again.
Heavy rain in late September and again in October has caused further deadly avalanches, landslides and flooding, adding to people’s pain.
The “roof” of the world – mountain top glaciers that more than 1.9 billion people rely on for water and energy – is no longer stable.
New conversation on climate justice
I represent a young nation. Our administration was elected into office by young people who want transparency and accountability in politics, just like their peers around the world.
In addition to the massive challenges our administration now faces – it will cost at least 10% of our GDP to respond to the glacial collapse – we are committed to building a state that delivers decent jobs, social protection, and a fair chance for every Nepali to thrive at home.
This is why we also believe in multilateralism. We are ready to lead a new conversation about climate justice in today’s context, shaped by the aspirations of a new generation.
Nepal seeks stronger recognition of mountain issues in UN climate process
We may be at the sharp edge of the climate crisis, but the whole world is in this together. The impacts we now face are precisely what the international agreements on climate change were designed to protect against. The science was clear this would happen. That’s why the world agreed over ten years ago, together, to limit warming to 1.5ºC – to avoid dangerous climate change.
Solidarity for one another was at the heart of those agreements, along with the “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities” principle that those who have historically contributed more to the problem, and those with greater capacity to respond, must do more.
Push for formal recognition at COP
In the mountains, the climate crisis arrives early. This is why Nepal has proposed a new Himalayan Climate Resilience Mechanism, and why we joined with the Royal Government of Bhutan, and the government of Kyrgyzstan to push for COP31 to formally recognise the challenge mountains are facing with a standalone agenda item in Antalya. We urgently need to discuss with the international community how we can better access finance that is adequate, timely, accessible, predictable and grant-based, as well as support for research and early warning systems.
Nepal and Bhutan’s submitted agenda will now be further discussed at the COP presidency consultation, where we have also highlighted that the mountain framework should be focused and reflected in the cover decision. This week and next we will be engaging with governments and the COP presidency for the mountain agenda. Progress in these dialogues is essential.
Meanwhile, we are deeply grateful for the support of our neighbours and other friendly countries who came to our immediate aid in August. Individuals and companies from all over the world have donated to the Prime Minister’s Disaster Relief Fund, touching our hearts when they are most tender.
Solidarity and friendships you can count on are essential when disaster comes to your door.
And every door is at risk. Climate-charged floods, wildfires and droughts that destroy lives and livelihoods and affect supply chains across borders are here to stay.
Solidarity for a safe and fair future
This is why it’s more critical than ever that dedicated, predictable, adequate, accessible grant-based funding is available, fast and fair to help people cope with the loss and damage now, and adapt to what is coming and build community resilience.
We also need to see clear, actionable roadmaps for transitioning away from fossil fuels, aligned with the 1.5ºC temperature limit, with clear timelines, and protections for workers and communities, as the UN Secretary-General recently called for in New York.
Last year the International Court of Justice reinforced the fact that all nation-states have strict legal obligations under international law to protect the climate system and curb greenhouse gas emissions.
In Nepal, we see great potential for revolutionary developments in information and power to drive down emissions and support new state-of-the-art solutions to the climate crisis. These could include sophisticated yet easily accessible early warning systems that save lives and livelihoods.
We may not be able to put the roof of the world back together by ourselves, but with solidarity from the global community, in the spirit of multilateralism, we can look at new ways of building the future for the safety and security of us all.
The post Nepal’s climate suffering must pave the way for a safe and fair future appeared first on Climate Home News.
Nepal’s climate suffering must pave the way for a safe and fair future
Scientists behind a landmark UN report on overshooting the 1.5C warming limit have defended its credibility, after Saudi Arabia and other large developing countries questioned its scientific legitimacy and sought to keep it out of the main political decision expected from COP31.
The UN Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Limiting Overshoot report, published in September, examines how to minimise an almost certain breach of the Paris Agreement’s temperature goal, what crossing it will mean for people and ecosystems and how temperatures could be brought back down.
The European Union, the UK, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and small island states are among those pushing for COP31 to make the response to overshoot of 1.5C one of the summit’s priorities.
But during closed-door consultations on the cover decision this week, the Arab Group, led by Saudi Arabia, have tried to cast doubt on the report’s scientific rigour, arguing it had not been peer-reviewed, according to sources familiar with the discussions.
Meanwhile, the bloc of Like-Minded Developing Countries (LDMCs), which included India and China, called for the cover decision to avoid references to reports produced outside the UN climate process, seen by observers as a thinly-veiled reference to the UNEP report.
Laurence Tubiana, CEO of the European Climate Foundation and one of the key architects of the Paris Agreement, said the overshoot report “tells us a truth some would rather hide”.
“We are on course to exceed 1.5C and limiting how far and for how long is a matter of survival for us all,” she told Climate Home News. “The attacks on climate science are an attempt to delay action. They target intergovernmental institutions that give countries a shared scientific basis for acting together.”
-
Science ‘under attack’ from fossil fuel interests at UN climate talks
A coalition of some rich nations and the world’s most vulnerable have vowed to protect climate science in UN negotiations -
Framing the climate science debate as a binary battle isn’t just wrong – it’s dangerous
Achieving the Paris Agreement goals requires robust science that fully integrates the experiences, economic realities and academic contributions of the Global South
Rigorous approach
Speaking at an event in Antalya on Saturday, scientists involved in the report also pushed back.
Debra Roberts, a South African scientist who co-chaired the IPCC’s Working Group II in its last assessment cycle and was part of the UNEP report’s core coordinating team, said the authors had followed the standard process for a global assessment of existing science, in line with the practices of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The only difference, she said, was that governments did not review the outputs.
“It was certainly reviewed internally by the authors, external peer-reviewers were brought into the process, and UNEP also reviewed it,” she told Climate Home News.
Forty-four experts from across the globe authored the report, which largely synthesises existing literature, and their work was scrutinised by a further 44 reviewers in a year-long exercise.
“Let’s be straightforward here: the reports are being attacked because some people don’t like the conclusions and it’s fairly obvious why,” Bill Hare, CEO of Climate Analytics and one of the report’s reviewers, told Climate Home News.
“If you as a government are basing your economy on burning and selling fossil fuels, then the last thing you want to do is accept that we are overshooting 1.5C, because then obviously you will take on some responsibility for paying for the damage,” he added.
“Grey literature” debate
In Antalya, some big emerging economies have also called for “grey literature”, including the overshoot report, to be kept out of the cover decision. The term refers to scientific products that are published outside of traditional academic journals.
While that applies to the UNEP report, some of its authors said it should not mean “grey literature” is of lower quality and cannot be used to inform policy-making.
They added that other forms of “grey literature”, including the UNEP Emissions and Adaptation Gap reports or the work of the International Energy Agency (IEA), are routinely used in the IPCC climate science assessment cycles and sometimes referenced in COP decisions.
Manjeet Dhakal, a Nepalese advisor to the LDCs, told Climate Home News those reports have previously been very useful to inform policy-makers. He added that the overshoot report is comprehensive and countries should be guided by it in Antalya.
‘A distraction’ amid bigger science spat
One of the UNEP report authors said the attempts by some countries to cast doubt on the overshoot report is just “a distraction”.
Clashes over climate science and its role in policy-making have escalated over the last few years amid a long-running stand-off at the IPCC. Most governments want the panel to produce all of its key assessment reports in time to inform the next UN Global Stocktake of climate action, due to be completed in November 2028.
But a smaller group of countries, led by Saudi Arabia, India and Russia, have resisted, claiming that timeline would be too rushed for scientists and governments from developing countries to contribute to and review the reports.
The IPCC will reconvene in an online meeting in early December in a last-ditch effort to find a solution.
As well as the IPCC assessments, Tubiana said the findings of the overshoot report must also inform the next global stocktake.
The post Scientists defend UN overshoot report after Saudi-led push to sideline it at COP31 appeared first on Climate Home News.
Scientists defend UN overshoot report after Saudi-led push to sideline it at COP31
As technical negotiators race to lay the ground for the big political fights coming in the second week of COP31, delegates will spend their Saturday night at a stocktaking plenary presided over by Türkiye and Australia, where countries’ first red lines are expected to emerge.
Countries will have to decide whether to move forward with a cover decision as the main outcome from the Antalya talks. Some large developing countries have pushed back on it all week, as well as on any inclusion of sectoral targets, including a flagship new pledge to increase electrification to 35% by 2035.
UN climate chief Simon Stiell told a press conference on Saturday morning that progress so far has been “constructive” and praised the fact that negotiations were able to start on time as countries avoided what had seemed to be shaping up as a fight over the agenda.
He added that Saturday’s plenary will provide a sense of the most controversial issues, which government ministers now flying will have to take up and settle.
As of now, most issues on the formal agenda still need a lot of work. The cover text is more a wishlist of every proposal tabled and still needs to be worked up into a draft – expected by early next week.
An informal note on the Mitigation Work Programme (MWP), which tackles cutting planet-heating emissions, is heavily bracketed. The EU has said one of its priorities is to extend the MWP, with current options for a timeline going up to 2030, 2031 or 2040 (at COP45!). The MWP has so far delivered weak outcomes, but the current fight is over whether to expand its scope and task it with informing the next Global Stocktake of climate policies in 2028.
-
COP31 Bulletin Day 5: Cover decision wishlist issued as China bows out of COP33 hosting
Governments must start narrowing down what a political decision could look like in Antalya, while the conversation buzzes around who will host 2028’s important COP -
Push for ocean roadmap that informs next global stocktake grows at COP31
A group of countries including African nations, European Union, and small island states wants COP31 to deliver an ocean roadmap towards 2028 -
COP31’s electrification pledge wins support, with caveats on clean power and finance
At least 14 countries have endorsed the voluntary pledge so far, but island nations warn it must not distract from the shift away from fossil fuels
A separate draft text on the global goal on adaptation released overnight is set to become the main battleground for Africa’s top priority to triple adaptation finance to “at least $120 billion per year by 2035”, based on a previous goal set in 2021 – a figure it wants agreed in Antalya.
Another option in the text proposes starting a process to review several elements of this finance target – which was adopted in the final deal at COP30 – including the baseline, the total amount and its scope. It requests this to be reflected in a report that would then be considered at a later summit. African countries are likely to push back on this idea.
An informal note that includes the set-up of a new Just Transition Mechanism also came out late on Friday and has been condemned by civil society groups for the limited scope of what it would be expected to achieve.
In the meantime, the Turkish and Australian co-presidency has continued consultations on a number of issues, including on how to strengthen the UN climate process itself. Some countries – including Arab nations, Mexico, Korea and Switzerland – have proposed switching COPs to a biennial format, instead of the current yearly summits.
Brazil says it wants to host third fossil fuel phase-out conference
Brazilian President Lula da Silva told civil society in Antalya this week that his country should host the third global conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels (TAFF), which would likely fall in 2028.
“We have the moral obligation,” Lula said at a meeting before heading off to the Philippines for the ASEAN summit. The Brazilian president told the event he came to Antalya to demonstrate that “no country has more credibility on climate” than his.
The first conference on TAFF was held in Santa Marta by a coalition of around 60 governments that decided to take voluntary measures to wean their economies off coal, oil and gas. The next conference is expected to take place mid-next year in Tuvalu, with a pre-conference event for academics, subnational governments and civil society in Dublin.
In Antalya, Brazil’s COP30 presidency held a big launch event for a voluntary global roadmap it produced to help countries shift off fossil fuels, proposing a build-up of clean energy systems followed by a push to start phasing out coal, oil and gas production and consumption after 2031.
Currently, a proposal to welcome the Brazil-led roadmap in the formal UN negotiations is included in the COP31 cover decision, as well as an option for “ongoing implementation” of a COP28 landmark deal to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems.
The post COP31 Bulletin Day 6: Limited progress as ministers arrive in Antalya appeared first on Climate Home News.
https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/11/14/cop31-bulletin-day-6-limited-progress-as-ministers-arrive-in-antalya/
Climate Change
‘Stop dicking around’: Bowen facing uphill battle amidst insufficient progress at COP31 climate talks
Antalya, Türkiye, Saturday 14 November 2026 — At the midway point of the COP31 climate talks where Australia is chairing negotiations, vital work is still needed to deliver real progress to phase out fossil fuels, protect the 1.5°C temperature goal, and to massively scale-up climate finance.
On Friday, the COP31 Presidency released a ‘summary of reflections’ on the proposed cover decision, providing a ‘Christmas list’ of options for the COP31 outcome, including proposals to advance the transition away from fossil fuels, recognition of the critical role of forests and oceans, and a response to the urgency of 1.5°C overshoot. But these are not yet agreed commitments, and they need to be strengthened in any cover decision, not diluted, says Greenpeace.
Speaking from Antalya, Dr Simon Bradshaw, COP31 Lead at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “It’s time to stop dicking around. Australia must focus on the urgent task of accelerating the global transition away from fossil fuels. We are experiencing rapidly worsening climate impacts, and a crippling cost of living crisis driven by fossil fuel dependence, yet the negotiating rooms are becoming increasingly disconnected from the brutal realities faced by communities all around the world.
“In week two, there is everything left to play for. The COP31 Presidency can deliver an ambitious outcome the world desperately needs, but it’s going to take the very best of us. Our message to the Presidency is: Don’t stuff this up.”
Also in Antalya, Shiva Gounden, Head of Pacific at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Now that leaders have departed Antalya we can get down to the urgent work at hand — delivering real progress to end fossil fuels and defend the 1.5°C limit. We must refuse to let these rooms become detached from the Pacific’s reality, where a breached 1.5°C will drown our history and identities, every fraction of a degree of overshoot fuelling more irreversible harm for our communities.
“This crisis requires more than speeches; it requires Pacific courage. True leadership demands bravery to chart a course away from fossil fuels and to stop every new coal, oil and gas project in its tracks. The Presidency must deliver.”
ENDS
COP31 images and video available here in Greenpeace Media Library
Media contact: Kate O’Callaghan in Antalya (GMT+3) on +61 406 231 892 (Whatsapp/Signal)
