Yesterday, the Ways and Means Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives introduced the first draft of its section of the GOP’s “one big bill,” and it takes a chainsaw to tax credits for clean energy and transportation. In this draft, nearly all of the federal clean energy credits are taken away from Americans, the result of which would be higher energy costs we all would be forced to pay, and fewer options for taxpayers to reduce their tax bills.
Here is a brief summary of how the draft policy would harm Americans through repealing key tax credits:
- Tax credits for electric vehicles (personal and commercial) would mostly be taken away after this year, depriving Americans of 7 years of availability, generally, and hundreds of billions of dollars of credits and reduced transportation costs
- Tax credits for residential energy efficiency, solar, and batteries would be taken away after this year, depriving American households of 7-9 years of availability and more than 100 billion dollars
- The availability of commercial tax credits for businesses, governments, schools, nonprofit organizations and more to install or produce clean electricity would be cut very short, with most future clean energy projects ineligible for the full credits
- Tax credits for businesses to manufacture wind energy components get taken away 5 years early
- Tax credits for businesses, governments, schools, nonprofit organizations and more to install geothermal heat pump credits would get 3 years of availability taken away
- A provision known as transferability of commercial tax credits would be taken away on various timelines, depending on the specific credit, so the credits will be worth less and harder to monetize
This draft proposal harms American households and is also anti-business. Here are a few reasons why Congress must rethink this reckless approach to energy policy:
1) Clean Energy Tax Credits Lower Energy Costs For Everyone
Clean energy tax credits lower energy costs for all Americans, not just those directly filing for the tax credits. Recent research by multiple independent expert firms has found that repealing the clean electricity tax credits would raise energy costs for consumers and worsen inflation. Repealing two of the biggest tax credits is estimated to raise household energy bills by around $6 billion annually in the next five years and $25 billion annually by 2040. Put another way, annual household utility bills could increase by more than $110 on average, and businesses could see at least a 10% increase in energy costs, which would be passed on to consumers. One of these studies found that North Carolinians, South Carolinians, and Tennesseans would be particularly hard hit by higher electricity prices, facing 10-15% higher prices for residential customers in 2026 and 2029 without the major clean energy tax credits. Without these tax credits, commercial and industrial customers in these states would be paying 15-22% higher electricity prices in 2026 and 2029.
2) Clean Energy Tax Credits Are Incredibly Effective At Reshoring Manufacturing and Spurring The Economy and Job Growth Nationally and Especially in the Southeast
The current energy tax credit law is spurring the largest expansion of factory construction in American history. Companies have announced and advanced 751 new projects, $422 billion in investments, and 406,007 new jobs in the clean energy and clean vehicle industries across the nation since August 2022, when many of the clean energy tax credits were either extended or initially created.
Looking specifically at our region of the Southeast, in North Carolina, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, we have benefited with announcements totaling more than $73 billion in private investment into the clean energy industry supply chain, and more than 92,000 new clean energy jobs.
Repealing or compromising the clean energy and clean vehicle tax credits would jeopardize or reverse this growth. For example, expert research has found that eliminating the clean vehicle tax credits would put as much as 100% of planned construction and expansion of U.S. electric vehicle assembly and half of existing assembly capacity at risk of cancellation or closure, and could put 29-72% of battery cell manufacturing capacity currently operating or online by the end of 2025 at risk of closure, in addition to 100% of other planned facilities.
3) Clean Energy Resources Are Best Positioned to Meet Near-Term Energy Demands for Economic Growth
Power demand is surging with economic growth, seen most dramatically in domestic manufacturing and the computing needs for AI. Solar and battery projects are already in grid interconnection queues and can be built to supply these needs much faster than any other sources of new generation. Large solar and battery projects can typically be online less than 18 months after contracts are signed and permits approved, whereas gas power plants typically take multiple years and nuclear plants take over a decade.
You don’t need to take our word for it…the trade group for investor-owned utilities, Edison Electric Institute, says “In the event of a significant reduction in these tax credits, it is estimated that nearly 75 gigawatts of planned new generation capacity will be cancelled between 2025 and 2032. While some of the planned renewable generation will shift to natural gas, it is not enough to meet the anticipated energy demand during this time frame.”
Republicans in Congress Must Fix This Mess
If the goal of this bill is to lower costs for working families and grow American businesses, this draft bill not only fails miserably, but completely backfires. This bill is widely expected to be a party-line bill, meaning if it’s Republicans who pass it, then it’s Republicans who will bear the blame of these cost increases on Americans and business-stifling policies. It’s also Republicans who can fix it, starting today. Indeed, quite a number of Republican members of Congress have already put themselves on the record in support of continuing the tax credits and keeping the positive impacts the credits bring about (i.e. here, here, and here).
Today is the bill’s first hearing in the Ways and Means Committee. It is expected that the bill will be taken up on the House floor next week, and then will be taken up by the Senate next month. Each of these steps gives opportunities for legislators to fix this mess and preserve the good energy policy that is demonstrably working in favor of Americans.
Please take a moment to email or call your members of Congress, asking them to stand up for consumers and defend clean energy tax policy.
The post The House GOP’s Energy Policy Would Increase Your Bills and Raise Taxes appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
The House GOP’s Energy Policy Would Increase Your Bills and Raise Taxes
Renewable Energy
Poland Powers First Offshore Wind, Vestas Expands in Japan
Poland Powers First Offshore Wind, Vestas Expands in Japan
Allen covers Poland connecting its first offshore wind farm, Ocean Winds reaching full power in the Mediterranean, Stiesdal’s floating wind cost breakthrough, Vestas expanding in Australia and Japan, a federal permitting freeze stalling 250 US projects, and India passing 50% clean power.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Happy Monday, everyone.
A coal-dependent nation just plugged into offshore wind for the very first time. Poland’s power grid received electricity this past week from its first offshore wind farm in the Baltic Sea. It’s called Baltic Power, a joint venture between Poland’s Orlen and Canada’s Northland Power. It began sending electricity from its 76 turbines to shore — about a 1.4-gigawatt site, enough to power more than 1.5 million Polish homes.
And this is more than just one wind farm. Poland is shifting its entire energy map. For decades, the center of electricity generation sat in the coal-rich south. Now it’s moving to northern Poland, to the coast. The country plans six gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030. Equinor and Ørsted are both set to build along that Polish shoreline, and that’s good news. A new 530-million-złoty substation — about $140 million — is part of a plan to build nearly 5,000 kilometers of high-voltage lines to carry the power to southern Poland. Coal still supplies more than half of Poland’s electricity, but that number is about to change.
And now down to the south of France. Ocean Winds, the offshore wind company created by EDP Renewables and Engie, just reached full power at a floating wind farm in the Mediterranean Sea. It’s three 10-megawatt turbines sitting on semi-submersible floaters 16 kilometers off the coast. It’s a pilot project, but the lessons are real: 99% of the suppliers are European, 85% French, and it proves that floating offshore wind can work in deep Mediterranean waters.
Now we’ll stay with floating wind for a moment. Danish company Stiesdal Offshore says it has cracked the cost code, and this is important. The company modeled what it would take to build a full-scale floating wind farm — one gigawatt from a single port in a single installation season, loading out one turbine per week. And the cost? Less than one million euros per megawatt. That is on par with the jacket foundations used for fixed-bottom turbines in deeper water. About 80% of the world’s oceans are roughly too deep for conventional foundations. And if those numbers hold — one million per megawatt — floating wind just got a whole lot more investable.
Meanwhile, Danish Vestas is making moves on two continents. In Australia, the Danish giant bought a 272-megawatt project in Tasmania from Ark Energy. It’s called the St. Patrick’s Plains Wind Farm, and once built it would be the biggest wind project site in the state. Vestas now has more than 13 gigawatts of wind projects in its Australian pipeline. So the model is clear: buy early-stage projects, bring in investors and offtakers, then supply the turbines to build the farm. The turbine supplier is turning into a wind developer.
And over in Japan, Vestas secured backing from the Japanese government to build a wind turbine assembly factory. Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry has committed support for the facility. Vestas already has about two gigawatts of turbines installed in Japan, including machines at the country’s largest operational offshore wind farm. A factory on Japanese soil puts Vestas closer to an offshore market that is just getting started.
Now we turn back to the United States. In Minnesota, four wind energy projects are stuck in limbo. The Department of War has stopped completing national security reviews for proposed wind farms. Those reviews used to be routine. A new report says more than 250 wind projects are stalled nationwide because of it. In Minnesota alone, the four frozen projects represent over one gigawatt — that is more output than the state’s twin nuclear reactors at the Prairie Island Power Plant. So at stake is $1.6 billion in direct investment, about 5,600 jobs, and more than $168 million in economic impact. Nine clean energy groups have sued the War Department to break the logjam.
And over in Ohio, the state senate passed a bill that could block many new wind farms and solar farms. The bill says power sources must be available at least 50% of the time, and wind and solar on their own rarely hit that number. The Ohio Chamber of Commerce opposes the bill, and so does the grid operator. But the bill has passed the Senate and now heads to the House. And what a mess Ohio is creating for itself.
And finally, in India, for the second time ever, clean energy met more than 50% of the country’s electricity demand. It happened on July 6th. And in the first half of 2026, India installed nearly 29 gigawatts of new solar and wind combined. The country now has about 288 gigawatts of renewable capacity. A nation of 1.4 billion people just crossed the halfway mark on clean power. It’s pretty good — and they’ve done it twice now.
So here’s what to watch. The industry’s next chapter is not just about who builds the most megawatts. It’s about who controls the choke points: ports, permits, foundations, factory floors. The companies and countries solving those problems are the ones that will lead.
And that is the state of the wind industry for the 13th of July, 2026. Join us for the Uptime Wind Energy podcast tomorrow.
Renewable Energy
RIP Lindsey Graham, But What Does the “P” Stand For?
The death of Lindsey Graham has brought out a curious mixture of responses.
Some are full of respect and kindness–even among those who disagreed with him at every turn, i.e., humanitarian progressives, believers in U.S. democracy, and the like. Are the motives of these kind people politically motivated? It’s hard to know.
There’s precious little ambiguity in the response at left of battered Capitol policeman Michael Fanone.
Renewable Energy
“Decisive Strength” from Donald Trump?
I’m not sure. Starting a pointless and illegal war that has no end in sight, at enormous expense? One that has debased and degraded our nation on the global stage? Crashing our economy for the common American?
Doesn’t sound like a winner to me. Could be wrong.
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases12 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
